7 Must-Check Factors Before Applying to Any IPO

Indian retail investor reviewing IPO evaluation checklist with financial documents and charts showing critical investment factors
Evaluate these 7 critical factors before investing in any IPO to avoid costly mistakes and identify winning opportunities in India’s booming public markets.

The buzz around Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in India has reached fever pitch, with retail investors rushing to grab allotments hoping for bumper listing gains. However, not every IPO delivers stellar returns some list below their issue price, leaving investors disappointed and out of pocket. The difference between successful IPO investing and costly mistakes lies in systematic evaluation rather than blind speculation.​

This comprehensive guide walks you through seven critical factors you must evaluate before applying for any IPO, helping you make informed decisions based on fundamentals rather than hype. Whether you’re a first-time IPO investor or looking to refine your evaluation process, understanding these factors will significantly improve your chances of identifying winners while avoiding duds.​

Why You Shouldn’t Apply to Every IPO

The temptation to apply for every IPO that hits the market is understandable. Who doesn’t want to be part of the next multi-bagger success story ? However, treating IPOs like lottery tickets is a recipe for portfolio destruction. IPO investing requires careful evaluation of company financials, management quality, valuations, and market sentiment before committing your hard-earned money.​

The Listing Gain Myth

Many retail investors apply to IPOs purely expecting quick profits on listing day, a strategy that often backfires spectacularly. While some IPOs deliver strong listing gains, others open flat or at a discount to their issue price, trapping investors who haven’t done their homework. The reality is that listing performance depends on multiple factors including company fundamentals, overall market sentiment, and whether the IPO was priced fairly or aggressively.​

Real Cost of Uninformed IPO Investing

Blindly following the crowd into overhyped IPOs can lead to significant capital erosion, especially when valuations are stretched and fundamentals don’t support the pricing. The funds you block in multiple IPO applications could otherwise be deployed in proven businesses or quality stocks that offer better risk-reward ratios. Additionally, uninformed IPO investing often leads to emotional decision-making panic selling during post-listing volatility or holding onto poor performers for too long.​

Factor 1: Understand the Business Model and Industry Position

Before you invest a single rupee in an IPO, you must thoroughly understand what the company actually does and how it makes money. A company might sound exciting in advertisements and media coverage, but unless you grasp its core business model, revenue streams, and value proposition, you’re essentially gambling rather than investing.​

Key Questions About Business Scalability

Ask yourself: Is this business scalable and sustainable over the next 5-10 years ? Does the company sell products or services that address genuine market needs, or is it riding a temporary trend ? Can the business grow without proportionally increasing costs, or does expansion require constant heavy capital investment ? Companies with strong unit economics and natural scalability tend to deliver better long-term returns than those stuck in capital-intensive, low-margin operations.​

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Evaluate how the company stacks up against existing competitors. Is it a market leader, a promising challenger, or just another me-too player ? Understanding the competitive dynamics helps you assess whether the company has sustainable advantages like strong brand equity, proprietary technology, cost leadership, or network effects. Companies operating in sunrise industries with favorable tailwinds generally offer better growth prospects than those in highly commoditized or declining sectors.​

Factor 2: Analyze Financial Health and Performance Metrics

Numbers don’t lie, which is why financial analysis forms the backbone of sound IPO evaluation. The company’s Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) provides audited financials covering the past three years; this is your goldmine of objective data to assess the company’s health and trajectory.​

Revenue Growth and Profitability Trends

Look beyond headline revenue figures to understand the growth trajectory and its quality. Is revenue growing steadily year-over-year, or do you see erratic spikes that might indicate one-time deals ? More importantly, is this revenue growth translating into improving profitability, or is the company burning cash to chase top-line numbers ? Companies demonstrating consistent revenue growth with expanding profit margins typically make better long-term investments than those showing unsustainable or manufactured growth.​

Critical Financial Ratios to Check

What financial ratios should you check before IPO investment?
Focus on: (1) EPS (Earnings Per Share) for profitability per share, (2) P/E ratio compared to industry peers for valuation, (3) ROE (Return on Equity) above 15% indicating efficient capital use, (4) ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) for operational efficiency, and (5) Debt-to-Equity ratio below 1.0 for manageable leverage.

These ratios provide objective benchmarks to assess whether the IPO is fairly valued relative to its financial performance and peer companies. Don’t just look at absolute numbers, compare them against listed competitors in the same industry to understand if you’re paying a premium or getting a discount.​

Debt Levels and Cash Flow Position

High debt levels can be a major red flag, especially for companies in cyclical industries or those yet to achieve consistent profitability. Examine the debt-to-equity ratio and interest coverage ratio to understand if the company’s debt burden is manageable or concerning. Equally important is cash flow analysis companies with strong operating cash flows are better positioned to weather market downturns and fund growth without constantly raising external capital.​

Factor 3: Evaluate IPO Valuation and Pricing

Just because a company is going public doesn’t mean it’s offering shares at a fair or attractive price. Many IPOs are aggressively priced to maximize proceeds for existing investors and promoters, leaving little upside for retail participants. Understanding valuation helps you determine if you’re paying a reasonable price for the company’s earnings, assets, and growth prospects.​

Comparing Peer Valuations

The simplest valuation sanity check involves comparing the IPO’s pricing multiples with similar listed companies. If the IPO is priced at a P/E ratio of 50x while established industry leaders trade at 25-30x, you need a compelling reason to justify paying double the market rate. Sometimes premium valuations are justified by superior growth rates, stronger margins, or unique competitive advantages but often they’re simply expensive.​

Common Valuation Methods Explained

Comparison Table:

Valuation MethodWhat It MeasuresBest Used ForKey Limitation
Relative ValuationCompares metrics (P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA) with peer companies ​Companies in established industries with clear comparablesMay not work if no good peers exist or during market extremes ​
Absolute Valuation (DCF)Discounted future cash flows using time value of money ​Companies with predictable cash flows and stable business modelsHighly sensitive to assumptions about growth and discount rates ​
Economic ValuationFormula-based approach using debt, assets, income, market cap ​Objective baseline without comparisons or assumptions ​May not capture intangible assets or future potential ​

Spotting Overpriced IPOs

Warning signs of overvaluation include: pricing at significant premium to peers without clear justification, aggressive assumptions about future growth in the valuation model, and primary objective being to enable existing investors to cash out rather than fund genuine growth. When grey market premiums reach irrational levels before listing, it often indicates speculation has overtaken fundamentals, a signal to exercise caution.​

Factor 4: Review the DRHP and Use of IPO Proceeds

The Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) is the single most important document you must read before applying to any IPO. This comprehensive document filed with SEBI outlines everything from the company’s business model and financials to risk factors and how IPO funds will be utilized.​

How to Read a DRHP Effectively

How to analyze DRHP before IPO?
Start with: (1) Objects of the Issue section to understand fund utilization plans, (2) Financial statements for 3-year revenue/profit trends, (3) Risk Factors section for company-specific concerns, (4) Management and promoter background, (5) OFS vs fresh issue split, and (6) Related party transactions that might indicate corporate governance issues.

While DRHPs can run into hundreds of pages, focus your attention on these critical sections rather than trying to read every word. The DRHP is followed by the Red Herring Prospectus (RHP), which includes more finalized details including the price band always check the RHP as well before making your final decision.​

Red Flags in Fund Utilization Plans

Pay close attention to how the company plans to use the money raised. Companies deploying IPO proceeds toward business expansion, capacity building, technology investments, or debt reduction generally demonstrate stronger long-term orientation. However, if a significant portion is going toward “general corporate purposes” (code for unspecified use) or enabling promoter/early investor exits without corresponding fresh capital for growth, consider it a yellow flag.​

OFS vs Fresh Issue: What It Means for You

An IPO can consist of fresh shares issued by the company (fresh issue) or existing shares sold by current shareholders (Offer for Sale – OFS), or a combination of both. Fresh issues bring new capital into the company that can fund growth, while OFS simply transfers ownership from existing to new shareholders without adding capital to the business. An IPO that’s predominantly OFS with little fresh issue suggests existing investors are cashing out a potential warning sign about their confidence in future prospects.​

Factor 5: Assess Management Quality and Track Record

Even the best business idea can fail with poor execution, making management quality a critical evaluation factor. While you can’t personally interview the leadership team, you can research their backgrounds, track records, and governance practices to make an informed judgment.​

Promoter Background Check

Investigate the promoters’ and key management team’s previous ventures, educational qualifications, and industry experience. Have they successfully built businesses before, or is this their first major undertaking ? Leaders with proven track records in the same industry generally inspire more confidence than first-time entrepreneurs, though this shouldn’t automatically disqualify promising newcomers. Check for any history of regulatory issues, disputes with stakeholders, or involvement in failed ventures that might indicate red flags.​

Corporate Governance Indicators

Strong corporate governance practices include independent directors on the board, transparent related-party transaction policies, and clear communication with stakeholders. Review the DRHP section on related party transactions: excessive dealings with promoter-controlled entities at potentially unfavorable terms can indicate governance concerns. Companies that have voluntarily adopted higher governance standards than legally required often demonstrate better long-term shareholder alignment.​

Transparency and Shareholder Alignment

Examine how the management has treated minority shareholders in the past (if the company has raised previous rounds of funding). Have they been transparent about challenges, or do they tend to overpromise and underdeliver ? Management teams that maintain reasonable promoter holding (40-60%) after the IPO typically have better alignment with retail shareholders compared to those diluting heavily or retaining excessive control.​

Factor 6: Check Market Sentiment and Subscription Data

While fundamentals should drive your IPO investment decision, understanding market sentiment and subscription dynamics provides additional context about demand and potential listing performance. However, subscription data can be misleading if not interpreted correctly.​

Understanding Anchor Investor Participation

Anchor investors are institutional investors who get allocated shares one day before the IPO opens to retail investors. Strong participation from reputable domestic and international institutions generally signals confidence in the IPO’s fundamentals and pricing. However, be aware that anchor investors have only a 30-day lock-in period once that expires, selling pressure can affect stock prices. Don’t blindly follow anchor investors; they have different risk appetites, time horizons, and information access than retail investors.​

The Subscription Numbers Trap

Seeing an IPO subscribed 50x or 100x can create FOMO (fear of missing out), but subscription numbers alone don’t guarantee listing gains or long-term success. High subscription often reflects speculative demand rather than fundamental conviction. Additionally, SEBI’s allotment rules ensure that all retail applications under ₹2 lakh are treated equally, so applying for larger amounts doesn’t improve your allotment chances and unnecessarily blocks more capital.​

Grey Market Premium: Should You Care?

Is grey market premium (GMP) a reliable indicator for IPO investment?
No. While GMP reflects speculative sentiment and short-term demand, it’s not based on fundamentals and can change rapidly. High GMP often leads to profit-booking immediately post-listing. Use GMP as one data point among many, never as your primary decision-making criterion.

Factor 7: Consider Risk Factors and Exit Strategy

Every IPO carries inherent risks that you must understand and accept before investing. The DRHP’s risk factors section outlines company-specific and industry-wide risks read this carefully rather than skipping to the glossy business description.​

Common IPO Risk Categories

Risk factors typically include: business risks (competition, technology disruption, customer concentration), financial risks (debt burden, working capital requirements, forex exposure), regulatory risks (policy changes, compliance requirements), and management risks (key person dependency, succession planning). Companies in emerging or rapidly evolving industries face higher uncertainty compared to those in stable, mature sectors. Assess whether the potential returns justify the risk level for your personal risk appetite and portfolio allocation.​

Lock-in Periods and Selling Pressure

While retail investors can sell IPO shares immediately after listing (no lock-in), promoters and pre-IPO investors typically face lock-in restrictions ranging from 6 months to 3 years. Be aware of when major lock-ins expire, as significant selling pressure can emerge, particularly if the stock has performed well and early investors want to book profits. This doesn’t mean you should panic sell before lock-in expiry, but factor it into your holding strategy.​

When to Hold vs When to Exit

Define your investment thesis before applying. Are you looking for listing gains, or do you believe in the company’s 3-5 year growth story ? If your goal is long-term investment and fundamentals remain intact post-listing, temporary volatility shouldn’t trigger panic selling. However, if the company’s performance deteriorates significantly, management guidance proves unrealistic, or your original investment thesis breaks down, don’t hesitate to exit even at a loss. Tracking the company’s quarterly results and comparing them against management guidance helps you make informed hold-or-exit decisions.​

Common IPO Investment Mistakes to Avoid

Beyond the evaluation factors, being aware of common mistakes helps you sidestep costly errors that even experienced investors sometimes make. The biggest mistake is following herd mentality applying to an IPO just because everyone else is, without understanding if it fits your investment goals and risk profile. Ignore the noise and evaluate each IPO on its own merits.​

Other frequent mistakes include: investing purely for listing gains without considering fundamentals, falling for the valuation trap by ignoring stretched multiples, making decisions based solely on subscription data, applying large amounts to every IPO without being selective, not reading the DRHP and RHP documents, ignoring management quality and track record, and failing to track post-listing performance. Remember that IPOs should form only a small portion of your overall portfolio diversification across asset classes and investment stages protects you from concentrated IPO risk.​

Quick IPO Evaluation Checklist

Use this actionable checklist before applying to any IPO:​

Business & Industry (Factor 1)

  • ☐ Understand the business model clearly
  • ☐ Business is scalable and sustainable
  • ☐ Company has competitive advantages
  • ☐ Favorable industry tailwinds present

Financials (Factor 2)

  • ☐ Revenue growing steadily over 3 years
  • ☐ Improving profit margins
  • ☐ Positive operating cash flows
  • ☐ Manageable debt levels (D/E < 1.0)
  • ☐ ROE > 15%, ROCE > 12%

Valuation (Factor 3)

  • ☐ P/E ratio compared with listed peers
  • ☐ Not paying excessive premium without justification
  • ☐ Grey market premium is reasonable

IPO Documents (Factor 4)

  • ☐ Read DRHP/RHP thoroughly
  • ☐ Clear fund utilization plan
  • ☐ Reasonable fresh issue component
  • ☐ No major red flags in risk factors section

Management (Factor 5)

  • ☐ Promoters have relevant experience
  • ☐ No history of governance issues
  • ☐ Reasonable promoter holding post-IPO

Market & Sentiment (Factor 6)

  • ☐ Quality anchor investor participation
  • ☐ Not relying solely on subscription numbers

Risk & Exit (Factor 7)

  • ☐ Risk factors acceptable for your profile
  • ☐ Clear investment thesis defined
  • ☐ Exit strategy planned

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I apply for every IPO that comes to the market?
No, applying to every IPO without evaluation is risky and can lead to capital erosion. Only a fraction of IPOs deliver strong returns, making selective investing based on thorough analysis essential. Focus on companies with strong fundamentals, reasonable valuations, and long-term growth potential rather than chasing every opportunity.​

What is the difference between DRHP and RHP in an IPO?
DRHP (Draft Red Herring Prospectus) is the preliminary document filed with SEBI when a company first proposes an IPO, while RHP (Red Herring Prospectus) is the more complete, finalized version filed later with additional details including the price band. RHP comes closer to the IPO opening date and includes SEBI’s observations and additional information requested during review.​

How can I check if an IPO is overvalued?
Compare the IPO’s valuation multiples (P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA) with similar listed companies in the same industry. If the IPO is priced at a significant premium without clear justification through superior growth, margins, or competitive position, it may be overvalued. Also examine whether IPO proceeds are primarily funding growth or enabling existing investor exits.​

What financial ratios are most important when evaluating an IPO?
Key ratios include EPS (Earnings Per Share) for profitability, P/E ratio for valuation comparison, ROE (Return on Equity) above 15% indicating efficient capital utilization, ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) for operational efficiency, and Debt-to-Equity ratio below 1.0 for manageable leverage. Compare these against industry peers for proper context.​

Should I follow anchor investor participation when deciding on an IPO?
Anchor investor participation from reputable institutions can indicate confidence, but shouldn’t be your sole decision criterion. Anchor investors have different risk profiles, time horizons, and information access than retail investors. Additionally, their 30-day lock-in period means selling pressure can emerge soon after listing. Conduct your own fundamental analysis regardless of anchor participation.​

How reliable is grey market premium (GMP) as an indicator?
GMP reflects speculative sentiment and short-term demand but isn’t based on fundamentals. High GMP can attract profit-booking immediately post-listing, while low GMP doesn’t necessarily mean poor long-term prospects. Use GMP as one of many data points, never as your primary investment decision factor.​

What are the biggest mistakes retail investors make with IPOs?
Common mistakes include investing purely for listing gains without fundamental analysis, following herd mentality, making decisions based solely on subscription data, ignoring company valuation, not reading DRHP/RHP documents, applying large amounts to every IPO without selectivity, and failing to track post-listing performance. Avoiding these errors significantly improves IPO investment outcomes.​

How much of my portfolio should I allocate to IPOs?
IPOs should form only a small portion (typically 5-10%) of your overall portfolio due to their higher risk profile. Most IPOs are from companies without a proven public market track record, making them inherently more speculative than established listed companies. Maintain diversification across asset classes, market capitalizations, and investment stages.​

What does it mean if an IPO is mostly OFS (Offer for Sale)?
An IPO predominantly consisting of OFS means existing shareholders are selling their stakes rather than the company raising fresh capital. While not automatically negative, heavy OFS with minimal fresh issue suggests existing investors are cashing out, which may indicate their confidence in future prospects is limited. Prefer IPOs with substantial fresh issue components that bring growth capital into the business.​

When should I sell my IPO shares after allotment?
Your selling decision should be based on your original investment thesis and fundamental performance. If you invested for listing gains and receive a satisfactory premium, you might exit on listing day. For long-term holdings, track quarterly results against management guidance and overall business performance. Exit if fundamentals deteriorate significantly or your investment thesis breaks down, regardless of short-term price movements.

Scroll to Top